Creative Zen Micro - What Makes It Different?

When an excellent product comes out, like the iPod,is good at night or in subdued lighting. Even though they
there will always be the ones who follow with moreare not as small and thin as the nano, they are still
advanced technology, improving upon the originalsmall and thin enough to carry around your neck. Most
product. That is how technology moves up the rings ofreviews say its sound quality is superb, depending on
the ladder, with the development of additional superiorthe quality of ear buds, but customers who know
products, stepping on the backbones of previous ones.Creative Labs recognize that they are considered
With this in mind, the one presently at the top of theleaders in the industry for sound cards and digital
ladder of success is Creative Labs' Zen Micro player,sound devices (so why wouldn't the sound good?). A
the latest alternative technology in regard to digitalprevious problem of the Zen Micro was its issue with
music players.jack plugs breaking on the headset - which supposedly
Creative's Zen Micro has been designed withwas taken care of about a year ago. The problem
ergonomics in mind, fitting into the palm of the handwas not Creative Labs but the customers, such as the
while placing the touch-sensitive control pad in directstores, did not replace the defective merchandise on
line with just one finger. The purpose of the digitalthe shelves, keeping them and running them out.
player is to play music - not just look pretty. And theThe nano has a lot less features than the Zen Micro,
Zen plays music, considered a work horse insuch as having an FM radio which has the capability to
comparison to the iPod. It stores 2,500/3,000 songs instore 32 FM stations and record them on your
WMA or 1,250/1,500 in MP3 for the 5GB/6GB harddemand, in addition to having a built-in voice recorder.
disk. Also the Zen Micro can be used for on-line musicPlus the nano gets scratched up more on the surface
services and Window PCs, being able to download upas compared to the Zen Micro. Another top
to one song per second via the USB 2.0 port.advantage of the Zen Micro is their battery, as the
Customers who have a choice between the iPodlargest complaint about the iPod has always been its
nano and the Zen Micro, seem to choose the Zenbattery life and the fact it was not removable. Once
more often, but a lot depends on the customer. Theyou bought it - you had it! The new Zen Micro has a
Zen Micro has a more availability for a larger musicremovable rechargeable 12-hour playtime with MP3
library, a micro-drive player, its memory is 2.5 timesWMA or 16 hours with the FM radio. Zen's battery,
larger at the same price than the iPod nano with less.which right from the start, has grabbed dissatisfied
The Zen Micro is bulkier than the iPod nano, but a lotiPod customers who have been having massive
depends on what a person wants. The Zen design isproblems with the iPod's battery.
totally different than the iPod nano, with the youngerOverall, most customers who have purchased both
crowed preferring the nano for its slim stylish looks,digital players prefer the Zen Micro over the iPod. The
while the older customers tend to place emphasis onprice is a large factor, in addition to its capability to hold
sound fidelity and quality, which slides over to the Zena whole lot more music. Also, it doesn't scratch as
Micro.much as the iPod does, which is a drawback. After
Many customers say the iPod nano is impressiveawhile - it just doesn't look "cool" anymore. The sound
when first taken from its box: initial impressions arequality is excellent, with no complaints about it. The
excellent, flash based, decent sound, familiar set-upthing that is noticed quite a bit, it a lot of iPod buyers
from the iPod mini, functional, and portable - and so on.switched over to Zen Micro, but people who
But the Zen Micro has a large variety of colors, has apurchased Zen Micro first - never switched to iPod.
background perimeter and touch pad blue glow whichSays a lot, doesn't it?